While dieting, are sugar free energy drinks significantly less destructive than regular?
I’ve heard in passing that despite being labeled as “diet”, and having 0 calories listed under the nutritional facts, diet sodas aren’t all that much better than regular sodas.
Does anyone know how valid this is, and what the evidence behind it is?
With that example out of the way, the main question:
Does the same thing apply to lightly carbonated, sugar free energy drinks as well? And should someone dieting avoid indulging?
Tags: calories, diet sodas, energy drinks, free energy, nutritional facts
November 24th, 2009 at 1:17 pm
Its bad for you mentally…because you get cocky about how that item doesn’t count since it doesn’t have calories but there are other things inside them that are bad for you and can ruin your diet. It is best to avoid all DIET drinks including all energy drinks.
If you are looking for a boost. One a day makes a vitamin with energy. Green Bottle. You can look it up online on their website. Its a daily vitamin with a kick and your not taking in any calories or carbonation that will bloat your stomach.
Carbonated drinks can force you to go up one pant size just from the carbonation alone. Its like pumping your stomach full of air. After about two weeks of not drinking carbonated drinks all together….your stomach will flatten out.
November 24th, 2009 at 1:17 pm
TAB i love them!! they taste good! pack a punch and are conveniently sugar free.
November 24th, 2009 at 1:17 pm
Those sorts of drinks are healthier than the normal kinds. But really you should try drinking water. It is the healthiest thing there is, and you don’t have to worry about sugar, carbonation, chemicals, or calories.